2013年9月28日 星期六

Unselfishness

          It is easier to understand selfishness by comparing it with greedy concern for others, as we find it, for instance, in an oversolicitous mother. While she consciously believes that she is particularly fond of her child, she has actually a deeply repressed hostility toward the object of her concern. She is overconcerned not because she loves the child too much, but because she has to compensate for her lack of capacity to love him at all.
 
          This theory of the nature of selfishness is borne out by psychoanalytic experience with neurotic "unselfishness," a symptom of neurosis observed in not a few people who ususally are troubled not by this symtom but by others connected with it, like depression, tiredness, inability to work, failure in love relationships, and so on.
 
          Not only is unselfishness not felt as "symptom"; it is often the one redeeming character trait on which such people pride themselves. The "unselfish" person "does not want anything for himself"; he "lives only for others," is proud that he does not consider himself important. He is puzzled to find that in spite of his unselfishness he is unhappy, and that his relationships to those closest to him are unsatisfactory.
 
          Analytic work shows that his unselfishness is not something apart from his other symptoms but one of them, in fact othen the most important one; that he is paralyzed in his capacity to love or to enjoy anything; that hs is pervaded by hostility toward life and that behind the facade of unselfishness a subtle but not less intense self-centeredness is hidden. This person can be cured only if his unselfishness too is interpreted as a symptom along with the others, so that his lack of productiveness, which is at the root of both his unselfishness and his other troubles, can be corrected.
 
          The nature of unselfishness becomes particularly apparent in its effect on others, and most frequently in our culture in the effect the "unselfish" mother has on her children. She believes that by her unselfishness her children will experience what it means to be loved and to learn, in turn, what it means to love. The effect of her unselfishness, however, does not at all correspond to her expectations. The children do not show the happiness of persons who are convinced that they are loved; they are anxious, tense, afraid of the mother's disapproval and anxious to live up to her expectations. Usually, they are affected by their mother's hidden hostility toward life, which they sense rather than recognize clearly, and eventually they become imbued with it themselves.
 
          Altogether, the effect of the "unselfish" mother is not too different from that of the selfish one; indeed, it is often worse, because the mother's unselfishness prevents the children from criticizing her. They are put under the obligation not to disappoint her; they are taught, under the mask of virtue, dislike for life.
 
          If one has a chance to study the effect of a mother with genuine self-love, one can see that there is nothing more conductive to giving a child the experience of what love, joy and happiness are than being loved by a mother who loves herself....
 
excerpt from: Erich Fromm (1956) The Art of Loving.

2013年9月27日 星期五

Selfishness

          Granted that love for oneself and for others in principle is conjunctive, how do we explain selfishness, which obviously excludes any genuine concern for others? The selfish person is interested ony in himself, wants everything for himself, feels no pleasure in giving, but only in taking. The world outside is looked at only from the standpoint of what he can get out of it; he lacks interest in the needs of others, and respect for their dignity and integrity. He can see nothing but himself; he judges everyone and everything form its usefulness to him; he is basically unable to love. Does not this prove that concern for others and concern for oneself are unavoidable alternatives? This would be so if selfishness and self-love were identical. But that assumption is the very fallacy which has led to so many mistaken conclusions concerning our problem.
 
          Selfishess and self-love, far from being identical, are actually opposites.
 
          The selfish person does not love himself too much but too little; in fact he hates himself. This lack of fondness and care for himself, which is only one expression of his lack of productiveness, leaves him empty and frustrated. He is necessarily unhappy and anxiously concerned to snatch from life the satisfactions which he blocks himself from attaining. He seems to care too much for himself, but actually he only makes an unsuccessful attempt to cover up and compensate for his failure to care for his real self. Freud holds that the selfish person is narcissistic, as if he had withdrawn his love from others and turned it toward his own person. It is true that selfish persons are incapable of loving others, but they are not capable of loving themselves either.

excerpt from: Erich Fromm (1956) The Art of Loving.
pdf document: Selfishness

2013年9月25日 星期三

學習誠實地接觸情緒


一個長期對情緒缺乏認識的人,輕則脾氣暴躁,嚴重者會變得自欺欺人,缺乏真誠,最後甚至變得偽善、人格扭曲等。

其實透過接觸情緒,是一個讓我們真誠地認識自己的渠道。例如內疚,它是良知受到干擾而衍生的情緒,若然沒有內疚,我們連做錯事都不自知;又例如恐懼,它是讓我們感到安全受到威脅,再深一層來說,它是令我們知道自己的限制,自覺有限才覺悟自己渺小。
究竟要怎樣才能真誠地接觸情緒?......

一) 開放 (Non-judging)
很多時侯,批評令我們想改變和控制自己的情緒,只要對自己的感受予以不偏不倚的態度去接受,我們便能如實地察覺自己的內在經驗。

二) 耐性 (Patience)
耐性是一種智慧,有耐性的人,會明白萬物皆有時,欲速則不達,我們要對自己培養這份耐性。

三) 初心 (Beginner's Mind)
活在此時此刻,我們以「初心」的眼光來看周遭的一切,因為每刻經驗都是獨特的,蘊含生命本身的無限生機,如此我們會在平凡中看見不平凡。

四) 信任 (Trust)
信任自己、信任自己的感覺,學習聆聽自己的內在聲音。當我們對自己信任,也會更多信任別人。

五) 無求 (Non-striving)
有時我們做任何事都帶着目的,但接觸自己的內在經驗,純粹是為做回自己,純粹以活在當下的態度,接納每刻的經驗。

六) 接納 (Acceptance)
以如實的態度接納事情的本相。接納並不代表我們要喜歡或被動地面對一切,又或者啞忍任何不妥當的行為;接納只是如實地面對當下的所思、所想、所見。

七) 解執 (Letting go)
我們內心對某些思想、感受和情境都有所偏執,若是美好的經驗,我們想把它延長;若是不快的經驗,我們想除掉它;其實我們能以開放的態度放下偏執、接納事情的本相,去迎接每刻的經驗。

摘錄自黃麗彰(2006),《情緒傷害的醫治》

2013年9月24日 星期二

跨越痛苦的人

心態一
創傷令人覺得生命中有很多事情是不由人掌控的,因而體會到有一位偉大的主宰掌管這個宇宙與人生,從而建立了信念---意即不能透過肉眼證據,但卻透過一種靈性的經驗,相信那不能看見的事情。
 
心態二
雖然創傷的經驗太令人難受,但卻帶來了成長,包括自我認識,對生命的洞察等等;創傷的經歷反而增强一個人面對生命的勇氣。
 
心態三
雖然事情不能改變,但擴闊了理解事物的寬度與深度,從而增强接納事情的能力。
 
心態四
透過開放的心靈去聆聽,體諒那些傷害自己的人有其人性軟弱的一面,自己也如是,從而衍生一份虛懷,看見自己的不足。對人對己產生了體諒,增加了信任,不必要的猜度也隨之減少。
 
心態五
看見自己的不足,自己也曾傷害過別人,也曾得到別人的饒恕,於是內心衍生一份感激之情,更加能夠知足感恩。從知恩的經驗中確立自我價值,認識自己的需要,不用透過與別人比較來肯定自己,從而化解不公平與自憐的感覺。

摘錄自黃麗彰(2002),《婚姻中的創傷與饒恕》

pdf: 跨越痛苦的人

沈溺在痛苦的人


心態一
創傷令人覺得生命中有很多事情是不由人掌控的,因而內心充滿焦慮,便想操控環境來加强安全感。


心態二
創傷的經驗太令人害怕,不想再次經歷,因而把自己的內心封閉起來,不再期望,不再投入,以免再受傷害。


心態三
太多事情不如人意,沒有改變的餘地,惟有無奈地接受。


心態四
創傷帶來焦慮,不斷猜測有可能出現的不良後果;希望可以透視別人的不良動機,防患未然,避免自己受到傷害。


心態五
覺得周遭的人對不起自己,內心充滿怨忿,心靈有種不能填滿的渴求,需要不斷支取以求滿足。


摘錄自黃麗彰(2002),《婚姻中的創傷與饒恕》

pdf: 沈溺在痛苦的人



2013年9月23日 星期一

Sexual Desire

         Sexual desire aims at fusion - and is by no means only a physical appetite, the relief of a painful tension. But sexual desire can be stimulated by the anxiety of aloneness, by the wish to conquer or be conquered, by vanity, by the wish to hurt or even to destroy, as much as it can be stimulated by love.
          It seems that sexual desire can easily blend with and be stimulated by any strong emotion, of which love is only one. Because sexual desire is in the minds of most people coupled with the idea of love, they are easily misled to conclude that they love each other when they want each other physically.
          Love can inspire the wish for sexual union; in this case the physical relationship is lacking in greediness, in a wish to conquer or to be conquered, but is blended with tenderness.
          If the desire for physical union is not stimulated by love, if erotic love is not also brotherly love, it never leads to union in more than an orgiastic, transitory sense. Sexual attraction creates, for the moment, the illusion of union, yet without love this "union" leaves strangers as far apart as they were before - sometimes it makes them ashamed of each other, or even makes them hate each other, because when the illusion has gone they feel their estrangement even more markedly than before.
          Tenderness is by no means, as Freud believed, a sublimation of the sexual instinct; it is the direct outcome of brotherly love, and exists in physical as well as in nonphysical forms of love....

excerpt from: Erich Fromm (1956) The Art of Loving.
pdf document: Sexual Desire

2013年9月21日 星期六

A Group that can Fight Gracefully

          It may at first glance seem paradoxical that a community that is a safe place and a laboratory for disarmament should also be a place of conflict. Perhaps a story will help...

          A Sufi master was strolling through the streets one day with his students. When they came to the city square, a vicious battle was being fought between government troops and rebel forces. Horrified by the bloodshed, the students implored,"Quick, Master, which side should we help?"

         "Both," the Master replied. The students were confused. "Both?" they demanded. "Why should we help both?"

          "We need to help the authorities learn to listen to the aspirations of the people,"the Master answered,"and we need to help the rebels learn how not to compulsively reject authority."
         
          In genuine community there are no sides. It is not always easy, but by the time they reach community the members have learned how to give up cliques and factions. They have learned how to listen to each other and how not to reject each other. Sometimes consensus in community is reached with miraculous rapidity. But at other times it is arrived at only after lengthy struggle. Just because it is a safe place does not mean community is a place without conflict. It is, however, a place where conflict can be resolved without physical or emotional bloodshed and with wisdom as well as grace. A community is a group that can fight gracefully...

excerpt from: Scott Peck (1987) The Different Drum.
pdf document: A group that can fight gracefully.