If ethics constitutes the body of
norms for achieving excellence in performing the art of living, its most
general principles must follow from the nature of life in general and of human
existence in particular. In most general terms, the nature of all life is to
preserve and affirm its own existence. All organisms have an inherent tendency
to preserve their existence: it is from this fact that psychologists have
postulated an “instinct” of self-preservation. The first “duty” of an organism
is to be alive.
“To be alive” is a dynamic, not a
static, concept. Existence and the unfolding of the specific powers of an
organism are one and the same. All organisms have an inherent tendency to
actualize their specific potentialities. The aim of man’s life, therefore, is
to be understood as the unfolding of his powers according to the laws of his
nature.
Man, however, does not exist “in
general.” While sharing the core of human qualities with all members of his
species, he is always an individual, a unique entity, different from everybody
else. He differs by his particular blending of character, temperament, talents,
dispositions, just as he differs at his fingertips. He can affirm his human
potentialities only by realizing his individuality. The duty to be alive is the
same as the duty to become oneself, to develop into the individual one
potentially is.
To sum up, good in humanistic
ethics is the affirmation of life, the unfolding of man’s powers. Virtue is responsibility
toward his own existence. Evil constitutes the crippling of man’s powers; vice
is irresponsibility toward himself.
沒有留言:
張貼留言